Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasan Badruddin (17th Dai)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure)  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  01:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Hasan Badruddin (17th Dai)

Hasan Badruddin (17th Dai) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary sources, even those links are not working, does each dawoodi bohra dai deserve a special page? many dai of dawoodi bohra dont have a page , what is special\notable for this to have a page? Summichum (talk) 08:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: @Summichum:, I'm honestly not sure here. Not every Dai has a page, but do they deserve them? There must be a rule for this somewhere. Dawoodi Bohras are numerically smaller, similar to some eastern branches of Christianity. Does every pope for the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, for example, warrant an article? I don't know, I'm honeslty asking here. If we can find some sort of a consistent rule, it might help the decision here. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  04:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.